PkHonor

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:10 am Yeah? We can see some details for fights but not details for player based agreements in logs.

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:14 am It'd be more productive to discuss player made deals and the rules about them rather than debating the specifics on this one case.

Arrsenic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:16 am

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:14 am It'd be more productive to discuss player made deals and the rules about them rather than debating the specifics on this one case.

Nah, we're staying on this one, i want to show the game that these MORONS ARE NOTHING BUT A WOLFPACK, that hunts smaller packs \ individuals. ive been ruined before by them for an Honest mistake, not gonna let them spoil the game for longer.

Discuss the rule and PMDS on diff thread.

Arrsenic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:16 am

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:14 am It'd be more productive to discuss player made deals and the rules about them rather than debating the specifics on this one case.

Nah, we're staying on this one, i want to show the game that these MORONS ARE NOTHING BUT A WOLFPACK, that hunts smaller packs \ individuals. ive been ruined before by them for an Honest mistake, not gonna let them spoil the game for longer.

Discuss the rule and PMDS on diff thread.

Attack like wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:15 am

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:10 am Yeah? We can see some details for fights but not details for player based agreements in logs.

Logs would show what happened to the 1t he put up in his inv prior to stepping in the wildy though no? If it wasnt a risk fight like he says why would he put up 1t? why would he potentially have dropped the 1t right before the fight after seeing tayron put up 650b?

Its quite obvious what happened, and its quite obvious arrs time as a mod and having to deal with a prior scummy situation (hallow) shows that he knows how to take advantage of situations that present themselves under the guise of a player made deal.

I think its honestly stupid to have a vague rule and no exceptions and just say "sorry" when something major happens under the failed system. I know you dont fully support the current system church but speaking in general terms it looks very bad at this moment.

Will be ok2 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:19 am

Arrsenic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:16 am

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:14 am It'd be more productive to discuss player made deals and the rules about them rather than debating the specifics on this one case.

Nah, we're staying on this one, i want to show the game that these MORONS ARE NOTHING BUT A WOLFPACK, that hunts smaller packs \ individuals. ive been ruined before by them for an Honest mistake, not gonna let them spoil the game for longer.

Discuss the rule and PMDS on diff thread.

time and time again you scam for pixels, you ruin any creditability you have for 1T when you've got 200? you're lame my guy, prior to entering wild you showed him 1T tickets, maybe you dropped them? im sure staff could easily check. either way yet again you prove you should be IP banned.

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:21 am You understand I have to be careful how much I say about the logs and what they do and don't show.

And I will grant that I do sometimes overdo it with the speaking generally thing. I just don't want to risk making situations worse by saying something that isn't well thought out, as well as running the risk as having my opinions misinterpreted as statements made by the staff team.

Arrsenic wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:16 am

Church wrote: ↑Fri Jan 13, 2023 4:14 am It'd be more productive to discuss player made deals and the rules about them rather than debating the specifics on this one case.

Nah, we're staying on this one, i want to show the game that these MORONS ARE NOTHING BUT A WOLFPACK, that hunts smaller packs \ individuals. ive been ruined before by them for an Honest mistake, not gonna let them spoil the game for longer.

Discuss the rule and PMDS on diff thread.